ext_104666 ([identity profile] ceelove.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lillibet 2006-02-25 01:37 am (UTC)

Hmm, I guess I don't think of it in terms of choice at all. I certainly choose to do both paid and unpaid massage; and when I choose to do either, it doesn't become more or less "work."
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<sits [...] is...>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

Hmm, I guess I don't think of it in terms of choice at all. I certainly choose to do both paid and unpaid massage; and when I choose to do either, it doesn't become more or less "work." <sits and thinks for quite a while about what the distinction is...> It's not about payment (as there is certainly plenty of volunteer work in the world). It's not about commitment or responsibility. It's not about enjoyment.

Ah well. It is a very simplistic definition; maybe it doesn't work very well for other people.

I would consider your Theatre@First commitments to be "not-work," though of course I'd glibly use the phrase, "Elizabeth puts a lot of work into Theatre@First." Boy, I shouldn't join the debate team on the merits of my definition, should I?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting