lillibet: (Default)
[personal profile] lillibet
There's a funny column from The New Yorker making the rounds today, picking on the ridiculous characters in romantic comedies.

Here's my favorite bit:

For me, there is no difference between Ripley from “Alien” and any Katherine Heigl character. They are equally implausible. They’re all participating in a similar level of fakey razzle-dazzle, and I enjoy every second of it.

The funniest (or saddest?) thing is that I know people who fit at least three of these stereotypes and have been at least two of them.

Date: 2011-09-28 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
Years ago, I remember reading a column by some woman who suggested an equivalence scale for 'implausible action movie events' and 'implausible romantic comedy movie events'. So you could compare, for instance, "Billy Crystal running through New York City to be with Meg Ryan" and "Nic Cage injecting himself in the heart as the jets streak overhead on Alcatraz Island."

Date: 2011-09-28 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lillibet.livejournal.com
I am reminded of a post I read by a romance novelist who said she frequently heard the complaint that romance novels were "unrealistic". She related one such conversation, where she asked the complainer what kind of books s/he read and got "mysteries" as a response. She asked "OK, unrealistic...how many dead bodies have you seen in your lifetime? How many relationships have you had?"

In the comment thread of the post I recently linked to from Charlie Stross' blog, he had a nice takedown of someone dissing romances, which made me think much more highly of him, even though I don't read them any more.

Date: 2011-09-29 01:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
heh. yeah.

i figure the average romance novel and the average sf novel (or any other 'genre' novel, really) are probably about on par. there are the tropes of the genre, and sometimes it's done well and sometimes it's done ... less well.

Date: 2011-09-29 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] labingi.livejournal.com
Fun article! Thanks for linking.

Date: 2011-09-29 06:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trowa-barton.livejournal.com
I think you would like the Nostalgia Chick's take on romantic comedies and the nature of Chick Flicks (Would "Thelma & Louise count, for example?) especially as she compares "Sleepless in Seattle" with "When Harry Met Sally"

http://blip.tv/nostalgia-chick/nostalgia-chick-chick-flicks-sleepless-in-seattle-vs-when-harry-met-sally-5541727

Date: 2011-09-30 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lillibet.livejournal.com
I'm reminded of people claiming that The Time Traveler's Wife isn't science fiction, basically because it's well-written. Um...

Date: 2011-09-29 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shanghaibex.livejournal.com
Hmmm.. You could say I was the 'no fun at all' career-obsessed women. And then I quit my corporate job and relearned how to walk around the neighbourhood (Notting Hill, of course), buy myself flowers and have afternoon coffee with friends.

And then my guy friend needed a place to stay. One night I was in the shower and didn't hear him come in, and then emerged wearing my silk negligee to find him waiting in the living room, and then....

That does sound sort of implausible. Except it happened. Funny, that.


Date: 2011-09-30 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lillibet.livejournal.com
Well, you've always been too good to be true :)

Profile

lillibet: (Default)
lillibet

September 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 06:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios