Not enough sex with my violence
Aug. 28th, 2005 11:55 pmOn Sunday afternoon we went to see The Brothers Grimm with
gilana. It was fine. "Better than Van Helsing" seems to be the general consensus and that it is, easily. I enjoyed the way that Gilliam pulled in motifs from many different fairy tales and some of the effects were very cool. Perhaps it's just my mood, but it didn't really engage me. But Heath Ledger was very cute and earnest.
But what I really want to talk about now is The Transporter, which we finished watching tonight. It's a reasonable mid-grade action movie--just enough plot to hold together the action sequences, a star (Jason Statham) who can do most of his own fighting and stunts, a nice supporting actor turn by François Berléand as the world-weary Marseilles cop.
In the middle of the movie Frank & Lai, having just escaped underwater from a flaming house, break into another place and go in search of dry clothes. Lai strips (rear view, waist-down, lacy boy-style panties) and kisses Frank, who pushes her away, then grabs her...and we cut to the two of them sitting in the police station wearing borrowed clothing. Where's the sex scene? Well, obviously, they can't actually show people having sex in a PG-13 movie in which many men are killed with an inventive array of weapons and techniques (the oil-slick scene is particularly amusing)! Because sex is such an enormous problem in our society and kids might get the idea that adults actually have sex, when they can find the time in between hacking each other with fire axes and committing vehicular manslaughter (the car chases are also pretty cool)! How come the only bodily fluid that is permissible on screen is blood?
Nah, don't answer that question. I already know a lot of the answers.
But do answer this, please...when's the last time you saw an actual sex scene in a movie? (No, porn doesn't count.)
EDIT: I'm specifically interested in contemporary American movies, from a sociological perspective, although tips on good foreign films are always welcome.
But what I really want to talk about now is The Transporter, which we finished watching tonight. It's a reasonable mid-grade action movie--just enough plot to hold together the action sequences, a star (Jason Statham) who can do most of his own fighting and stunts, a nice supporting actor turn by François Berléand as the world-weary Marseilles cop.
In the middle of the movie Frank & Lai, having just escaped underwater from a flaming house, break into another place and go in search of dry clothes. Lai strips (rear view, waist-down, lacy boy-style panties) and kisses Frank, who pushes her away, then grabs her...and we cut to the two of them sitting in the police station wearing borrowed clothing. Where's the sex scene? Well, obviously, they can't actually show people having sex in a PG-13 movie in which many men are killed with an inventive array of weapons and techniques (the oil-slick scene is particularly amusing)! Because sex is such an enormous problem in our society and kids might get the idea that adults actually have sex, when they can find the time in between hacking each other with fire axes and committing vehicular manslaughter (the car chases are also pretty cool)! How come the only bodily fluid that is permissible on screen is blood?
Nah, don't answer that question. I already know a lot of the answers.
But do answer this, please...when's the last time you saw an actual sex scene in a movie? (No, porn doesn't count.)
EDIT: I'm specifically interested in contemporary American movies, from a sociological perspective, although tips on good foreign films are always welcome.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 05:25 am (UTC)There's also "Sex is Comedy", but that's French. There is also "2046" from China that was playing at the Kendall Square theater. Usually, that's the place for indies with bodily fluids other than blood.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 06:43 am (UTC)In any case, yes, I agree with you that there's too much violence and not enough sex in the media. I often wonder if the excess violence is a result of not enough sex, if not enough sex is a consequence of too much violence or, as it seems to be with most other cultures, it's just unrelated but it seems linked to people like me who grew up with "sex is better than violence" in the media.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 12:24 pm (UTC)I don't disagree with your overall point, that it's acceptable to show any amount of gratuitous violence, but I don't think it's hard for me to think of plenty of fairly recent movies that do show people in the middle of sex. Maybe I'm just lucky. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-24 10:00 am (UTC)I actually just sat down and looked through the movies I own. I was sort of successful - the second matrix movie has a pretty clear sexual scene. Still, it was rated R and between an established couple (I dont know that we could say they're married but the best approximation thereof is certainly assumed).
Still, it wasn't as explicit at the scene in Oldboy or other foreign films I can think of.
You make a very interesting point.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:09 pm (UTC)