![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Now, gossip, by its very definition, is trivial; on the other hand, is there a better way to really understand something than by appreciating all of its various trivialities? We don't cherish our friends simply because they're great thinkers, or saintly, or for any such lofty concerns. Rather it's a combination of all the small, trivial facets that combine to shape the image we carry of them; it's the complex final pattern, with all its daily shifts and adjustments, that we cherish.
Charles de Lint, The Wild Wood
Charles de Lint, The Wild Wood
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 06:35 pm (UTC)In as much, I think there are different kinds of gossip, some intended to share trivialities and some intended to hurt and slander, and perhaps one way we understant someone s not just by what trivialities we share, but *how* we share them.
Good food for thought, thanks.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 08:17 pm (UTC)Friends have tried to draw a distinction between what I (we?) do and that which is meant to hurt, but I sometimes think they're simply trying to put a nice face on it, as you said.
I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 08:13 am (UTC)The theory was much along the lines letting conversations become our grooming patterns. We could Converse with more than one person at a time. This evolved, in my conversations with Mom et all this weekend, into a conversation of how gossip plays into the whole grooming patterns.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 07:36 pm (UTC)